Texas Lawmakers Ready for Fight to Overturn Fort Hood ‘Workplace Violence’ Label

UPDATED: I just exchanged emails with Trey Gowdy who told me the SC Delegation is “on it!” YAY!

I am confident that the SC delegation will fully support this effort. If anyone sees/hears any of them talking about it please let us know.

Sometimes we out here are aware of issues before the delegation, so if we run into them at events, let’s encourage them to find out about this if they haven’t and get on board if, when it arrives in their sphere, they aren’t!

Bridget Johnson at PJMedia reports:

Texas lawmakers return from Veterans Day memorials on a mission for those hurt in the 2009 massacre at Fort Hood: making sure that those who serve our country get due recognition and benefits as victims of a domestic terror attack.

Infamously classified as “workplace violence” by the Obama administration, former Army psychiatrist Nidal Hasan killed 13 and wounded 32 in what he described as an act of jihad against soldiers going through processing before shipping out to Afghanistan.

But the continued refusal of the administration to acknowledge the attack as an act of terrorism has left the Fort Hood survivors shortchanged on honors and benefits, something that could change in a big bipartisan way with a bit of momentum this month.

The Honoring the Fort Hood Heroes Act was introduced in the upper chamber in September by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and in the House by Reps. John Carter (R-Texas) and Roger Williams (R-Texas). Carter and Williams share Fort Hood in their district boundaries.

The bill specifically states the attack was “not merely workplace violence,” notes the attack on Fort Hood “could and should have been prevented,” recognizes that Hasan “had become radicalized while serving in the United States Army and was principally motivated to carry out the attack by an ideology of violent Islamist extremism,” and adds “Hasan proved himself to be not just a terrorist, but also a traitor and an enemy of the United States.”

It stipulates that the Purple Heart should be awarded to service members killed or injured in the attack, and civilians killed or wounded should get the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom. Benefits would be the same for those killed or wounded in a combat zone, and post-traumatic stress disorder treatment would be covered.

Read the rest at the link above.

November 12, 2013  Tags:   Posted in: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply